The entry praises Yaḥyā’s retention of hadith, legal understanding, religious commitment and scrupulousness. It reports his frequent attendance with Abū Ḥanīfa and Ibn Abī Laylā, then quotes ʿAlī ibn al-Madīnī placing him among the leading scholars of their respective times.
3 source accounts
أخبرنَا أَحْمد بن مُحَمَّد الصَّيْرَفِي قَالَ أنبأ عَليّ بن عَمْرو الحريري قَالَ ثَنَا ابْن كأس النَّخعِيّ عَن أَبِيه قَالَ حَدثنِي صَالح بن سُهَيْل قَالَ كَانَ يحيى بن زَكَرِيَّا ابْن أبي زَائِدَة احفظ أهل زَمَانه للْحَدِيث وأفقههم مَعَ مجالسة كَثِيرَة لأبي حنيفَة وَابْن أبي ليلى وَدين وورع
أخبرنا أحمد بن محمد الصيرفي، قال: أنبأ علي بن عمرو الحريري، قال: ثنا ابن كاس النخعي، عن أبيه، قال: حدثني صالح بن سهل، قال: كان يحيى بن زكريا بن أبي زائدة أحفظ أهل زمانه للحديث، وأفقههم، مع مجالسة كثيرة لأبي حنيفة، وابن أبي ليلى، ودين وورع.
Show English translation
Aḥmad ibn Muḥammad al-Ṣayrafī informed us, saying: ʿAlī ibn ʿAmr al-Ḥarīrī informed us, saying: Ibn Kāʾs al-Nakhaʿī related to us on the authority of his father, who said: Ṣāliḥ ibn Suhayl related to me, saying: Yaḥyā ibn Zakariyyā ibn Abī Zāʾida possessed the strongest memory for hadith of the people of his time and was the most learned in jurisprudence. He spent much time in the company of Abū Ḥanīfa and Ibn Abī Laylā and possessed religious devotion and scrupulousness.
Aḥmad ibn Muḥammad al-Ṣayrafī informed us. He said: ʿAlī ibn ʿAmr al-Ḥarīrī informed us. He said: Ibn Kās al-Nakhaʿī narrated to us from his father, who said: Ṣāliḥ ibn Sahl narrated to me. He said: Yaḥyā ibn Zakariyyā ibn Abī Zāʾida had the strongest retention of hadith among the people of his time and was the most knowledgeable of them in jurisprudence. He frequently attended the sessions of Abū Ḥanīfa and Ibn Abī Laylā, and possessed religious commitment and scrupulousness.
Both report texts and their locations have been checked against the supplied scans. Punctuation and spacing are lightly normalized; editorial dates and entry numbers are kept outside the report text.
Edition comparison
Editorial reference
Baktāsh adds a biographical cross-reference reporting al-Ṭaḥāwī’s statement that ten leading companions, including Ibn Abī Zāʾida, wrote the books. This is a separate note, not an additional clause of this report.
Baktāsh edition, p. 259, n. 1: al-Jawāhir al-Muḍiyya 1/140.
Al-Afghānī edition, p. 156.
أخبرنَا أَحْمد بن مُحَمَّد الصَّيْرَفِي قَالَ ثَنَا عَليّ بن عَمْرو قَالَ ثَنَا ابْن كأس قَالَ حَدثنِي مُحَمَّد بن النَّضر الْأَزْدِيّ قَالَ سَمِعت عَليّ بن الْمَدِينِيّ يَقُول انْتهى الْعلم إِلَى ابْن عَبَّاس فِي زَمَانه وَإِلَى الشّعبِيّ فِي زَمَانه وَإِلَى سُفْيَان الثَّوْريّ فِي زَمَانه وَإِلَى يحيى بن زَكَرِيَّا بن أبي زَائِدَة فِي زَمَانه
أخبرنا أحمد بن محمد الصيرفي، قال: ثنا علي بن عمرو، قال: ثنا ابن كاس، قال: حدثني محمد بن النضر الأزدي، قال: سمعت علي بن المديني، يقول: انتهى العلم إلى ابن عباس رضي الله عنهما في زمانه، وإلى الشعبي في زمانه، وإلى سفيان الثوري في زمانه، وإلى يحيى بن زكريا بن أبي زائدة في زمانه.
Show English translation
Aḥmad ibn Muḥammad al-Ṣayrafī informed us, saying: ʿAlī ibn ʿAmr related to us, saying: Ibn Kāʾs related to us, saying: Muḥammad ibn al-Naḍr al-Azdī related to me, saying: I heard ʿAlī ibn al-Madīnī say: “Knowledge culminated in Ibn ʿAbbās in his time, in al-Shaʿbī in his time, in Sufyān al-Thawrī in his time, and in Yaḥyā ibn Zakariyyā ibn Abī Zāʾida in his time.”
Aḥmad ibn Muḥammad al-Ṣayrafī informed us. He said: ʿAlī ibn ʿAmr narrated to us. He said: Ibn Kās narrated to us. He said: Muḥammad ibn al-Naḍr al-Azdī narrated to me. He said: I heard ʿAlī ibn al-Madīnī say: Learning culminated in Ibn ʿAbbās, may God be pleased with them both, in his time, in al-Shaʿbī in his time, in Sufyān al-Thawrī in his time, and in Yaḥyā ibn Zakariyyā ibn Abī Zāʾida in his time.
Both report texts and their locations have been checked against the supplied scans. Punctuation and spacing are lightly normalized; editorial dates and entry numbers are kept outside the report text.
Edition comparison
Printed invocation
Baktāsh prints رضي الله عنهما after Ibn ʿAbbās, absent from the older passage. The sequence of scholars and its claim remain the same.
Al-Afghānī · 1985
إلى ابن عباس في زمانه
Baktāsh · 2023
إلى ابن عباس رضي الله عنهما في زمانه
Al-Afghānī edition, p. 156.
Baktāsh edition, p. 259.
أخبرنا عباس بن الفضل الهاشمي قال ثنا أحمد بن محمد قال ثنا علي بن محمد النخعي قال ثنا نجيح قال ثنا ابن كرامة قال كنا عند وكيع يوما فقال رجل أخطأ أبو حنيفة فقال وكيع يقدر أبو حنيفة يخطىء ومعه مثل أبي يوسف وزفر في قياسهما ومثل يحيى بن أبي زائدة وحفص بن غياث وحبان ومندل في حفظهم للحديث والقاسم بن معن في معرفته باللغة والعربية وفضيل بن عياض وداود الطائي في زهدهما وورعهما من كان هؤلاء جلساءه لم يكن يخطىء لأنه إن أخطأ ردوه
أخبرنا عباس بن الفضل الهاشمي قال ثنا أحمد بن محمد قال ثنا علي بن محمد النخعي قال ثنا نجيح قال ثنا ابن كرامة قال كنا عند وكيع يوما فقال رجل أخطأ أبو حنيفة فقال وكيع يقدر أبو حنيفة يخطىء ومعه مثل أبي يوسف وزفر في قياسهما ومثل يحيى بن أبي زائدة وحفص بن غياث وحبان ومندل في حفظهم للحديث والقاسم بن معن في معرفته باللغة والعربية وداود الطائي والفضيل بن عياض في زهدهما وورعهما من كان هؤلاء جلساءه لم يكن يخطىء لأنه إن أخطأ ردوه
Show English translation
ʿAbbās ibn al-Faḍl al-Hāshimī informed us, saying: Aḥmad ibn Muḥammad related to us, saying: ʿAlī ibn Muḥammad al-Nakhaʿī related to us, saying: Nujayḥ related to us, saying: Ibn Karāma related to us, saying: We were with Wakīʿ one day when a man said Abū Ḥanīfa made a mistake.” Wakīʿ said: “Could Abū Ḥanīfa make a mistake when he had with him the likes of Abū Yūsuf and Zufar in their analogical reasoning, the likes of Yaḥyā ibn Abī Zāʾida, Ḥafṣ ibn Ghiyāth, Ḥibbān, and Mandal in their memorization of hadith, al-Qāsim ibn Maʿn in his knowledge of language and Arabic, and al-Fuḍayl ibn ʿIyāḍ and Dāwūd al-Ṭāʾī in their renunciation and scrupulousness? Someone whose companions were these people would not err, because if he erred they would correct him.”
ʿAbbās ibn al-Faḍl al-Hāshimī informed us, saying: Aḥmad ibn Muḥammad related to us, saying: ʿAlī ibn Muḥammad al-Nakhaʿī related to us, saying: Nujayḥ related to us, saying: Ibn Karāma related to us, saying: We were with Wakīʿ one day when a man said Abū Ḥanīfa made a mistake.” Wakīʿ said: “Could Abū Ḥanīfa make a mistake when he had with him the likes of Abū Yūsuf and Zufar in their analogical reasoning, the likes of Yaḥyā ibn Abī Zāʾida, Ḥafṣ ibn Ghiyāth, Ḥibbān, and Mandal in their memorization of hadith, al-Qāsim ibn Maʿn in his knowledge of language and Arabic, and Dāwūd al-Ṭāʾī and al-Fuḍayl ibn ʿIyāḍ in their renunciation and scrupulousness? Someone whose companions were these people would not err, because if he erred they would correct him.”
Sources: Al-Afghānī · pp. 158–159 / Baktāsh · pp. 262–263
Both report texts and their locations have been checked against the supplied scans. Punctuation and spacing are lightly normalized; editorial dates and entry numbers are kept outside the report text.
Edition comparison
Order of names
The older edition lists al-Fuḍayl before Dāwūd; Baktāsh lists Dāwūd before al-Fuḍayl.